Nevada ethics panel advances complaint over Aaron Ford ‘luxury’ trips

The Nevada Commission on Ethics has decided to proceed with a complaint concerning state Attorney General Aaron Ford and his participation in what have been described as ‘luxury’ trips funded by outside organizations.

Commission Decision on Ethics Complaint

On Wednesday, the commission voted unanimously to advance the complaint to a hearing, following a preliminary review of the allegations. The complaint centers on Ford’s acceptance of travel and accommodations funded by third-party groups, including law firms and advocacy organizations, during his tenure as attorney general.

Details of the Allegations

The complaint alleges that Ford participated in several out-of-state trips, with expenses covered by entities that have interests in matters overseen by the attorney general’s office. According to the complaint, these trips included stays at high-end hotels and attendance at events hosted by organizations that have business before the state.

Attorney General Ford’s Response

Ford has stated that his travel was related to official duties and that all trips were disclosed in accordance with state requirements. In a statement, Ford said, “I have always complied with Nevada’s laws and disclosure obligations.” He further emphasized that the trips were part of his responsibilities as attorney general.

Next Steps in the Ethics Process

The commission’s decision to move forward means a formal hearing will be scheduled to examine the allegations in detail. The hearing will allow both sides to present evidence and testimony. The commission has not set a specific date for the hearing at this time.

Potential Outcomes

If the commission determines that Ford violated state ethics laws, possible consequences could include fines or other administrative actions. The commission has the authority to impose penalties if it finds a breach of ethical standards.

Background and Context

The complaint was initially filed earlier this year, prompting a preliminary review by the commission. The review process included an examination of Ford’s travel records and disclosures. The commission’s decision to advance the complaint does not indicate a finding of wrongdoing but allows for a full hearing on the matter.